Football Evaluations 2011
The following guidelines will be used when completing the CFOA Crew or Individual evaluation forms. When evaluations are being conducted they should be a fair assessment of the official’s performance, and any comments and/or feedback should be constructive in nature.
Game Rating Scale
The following numerical representations shall be used as guidelines for all game ratings for all officials for all games.
Scale below.
- Official needs improvement in several areas to attain fair level of competence. Performance may have poor impact on games officiated. Written Comment Required.
- Official maintains average level of competence. Errors are small points, and transparent to the game being officiated. Performance ensures crew has no impact on games officiated. Written Comment Required.
- Official maintains above average level of competence. Performance has positive impact on games officiated.
- Official maintains excellent level of competence. Performance influences games for most equitable result. Adapts seamlessly as game conditions change.
- Official maintains superior level of competence. Performance influences crew and game to best performance and result. Is able to teach - mentor colleagues to perform better. Subject matter Expert
When evaluating areas with a total score of 20 points, a written comment is required for any scores from 1 to 8 points. This would be the equivalent of receiving a 1 or a 2 for a score.
When evaluating areas with a total score of 25 points, a written comment is required for any scores from 1 to 10 points. This would be the equivalent of receiving a 1 or a 2 for a score.
Any questions regarding the evaluation process should be directed to the Evaluation Committee.
Evaluation Forms
Crew Evaluation Form (fillable form - PDF)
Crew Evaluation Form (Word document)
Official Evaluation Form (fillable form - PDF)
Official Evaluation Form (Word document)